Manager, Agency or VA: What Do You Actually Need?
An honest comparison of the three, what each costs, which stage of business each suits, and the contract red flags to watch for.
The short answer
A VA takes tasks off you, an agency runs a function for you, and a manager represents you commercially and takes a cut of what you earn. Most creators who think they need a manager actually need production help, because their bottleneck is output, not deals. Work out which of those three problems you have before you sign anything.
Contract terms are mentioned throughout. This is general information rather than legal advice, and anything you are asked to sign should be looked at by a solicitor.
The three things they actually are
Virtual assistant
What they do: defined tasks you hand over. Inbox, scheduling, uploading, basic editing, research, admin, chasing invoices. They execute; you decide.
Cost: hourly or a monthly retainer for a set number of hours. UK-based rates sit well above offshore rates, and the gap usually reflects timezone, context and communication rather than raw capability.
Suits: creators who know exactly what needs doing and are simply out of hours. If you can write the instruction, a VA can follow it.
The catch: a VA does not decide, and does not fix a broken process. If your workflow is chaotic, you are now paying someone to be confused alongside you. Management overhead is real: expect to spend a few hours a week directing them, especially at first.
Agency
What they do: own an outcome rather than a task list. Typically production and channel operations, sometimes growth or brand partnerships. They bring their own process, tools and staff, and you approve rather than instruct.
Cost: monthly retainer, scaled to scope. Some take a performance element on top.
Suits: creators with consistent output whose operational load has outgrown a single pair of hands, or who need capability they do not have, such as proper editing or multi-platform distribution.
The catch: you are buying a process, so you get some of their way of doing things. Quality varies enormously and the sales conversation is often better than the delivery. Ask who is actually doing the work, by name.
Manager
What they do: represent you. Negotiate deals, find opportunities, manage brand relationships, advise on direction, run interference. Their value is their contacts and their willingness to be difficult on your behalf.
Cost: commission on income, typically a percentage of what they bring in, though some try to commission everything you earn. That distinction matters more than the percentage.
Suits: creators already receiving more inbound commercial interest than they can handle or price properly. A manager multiplies existing demand. They rarely create it from nothing.
The catch: a manager with no relevant contacts is an expensive email forwarder. And commission on everything means paying for deals you sourced yourself.
Which one your stage of business actually needs
Rough guide, from practice:
- Doing everything yourself, output inconsistent, no commercial inbound. You need process and hours. A VA, or nothing yet.
- Output is consistent but the operational half is eating your week. Agency, or a specialist editor. This is the most common real situation and the most commonly misdiagnosed.
- Steady inbound deals, you are unsure of your worth, negotiation drains you. Manager.
- Multi-platform, several income streams, brand work at volume. Probably some combination, and at that point you also need an accountant.
The recurring error is hiring a manager to fix a production problem. A manager cannot make you post more. If the machine is not running, the person selling its output has nothing to sell.
Red flags
In manager agreements
- Commission on everything. Including income they had no part in generating, and sometimes income from before they arrived. Push for commission on deals they source or materially negotiate.
- Long lock-ins. Multi-year exclusive terms with no performance break. A confident manager will accept a short initial term.
- Post-term commission with no limit. A tail on deals they sourced is normal and reasonable. An indefinite tail on your entire income is not.
- Ownership of anything. Your handles, your channels, your content, your name or trading name. This should never move. Check who controls the accounts.
- Vagueness about who else they represent. Conflicts matter if they manage three people competing for the same brand budget.
In agency contracts
- Deliverables described in adjectives. "Full channel management" and "growth support" are not deliverables. Numbers of pieces, platforms, turnaround times and revision rounds are.
- Twelve-month minimums with no exit. Three to six months is plenty to demonstrate competence.
- The people who pitched are not the people who deliver. Extremely common. Ask directly.
- Guaranteed growth figures. Nobody can guarantee reach. Anyone claiming to is either buying it or lying.
- No named point of contact. Work routed through a shared inbox will drift.
In VA arrangements
- Vague hours. Track them or agree a fixed scope; otherwise the retainer quietly stops covering the work.
- No handover documentation. If everything lives in their head, their departure resets you to zero.
- Shared password access with no proper credential management. This is how accounts get lost.
Questions to ask before signing
- What exactly will you do in month one, week by week?
- Who does the work, and what else are they working on?
- How do I leave, how much notice, and what happens to my accounts and files?
- What do you need from me each week? (Anything requiring less than an hour of your input is probably not being done properly.)
- For managers: which of your relationships are relevant to my category, and what did you close in the last six months?
- For agencies: show me work for a creator at roughly my size, not your biggest client.
- What is not included?
- Who owns the content, the accounts and the audience data at the end?
The answers matter less than the manner. Anyone who becomes evasive about exit terms or ownership has told you something useful.
One more option
Sometimes the honest answer is none of them yet. If your process is undocumented and your output is erratic, spending two months writing down how you actually work and cutting what does not earn will do more than any hire. Delegation multiplies whatever system it lands on, including a bad one.
Where this fits
For most creators the bottleneck is the operational half of the job rather than the commercial half, which is the gap CORE works in: repurposing, scheduling and day-to-day channel management on clear deliverables and short terms. If you are unsure which of the three you need, the useful first step is simply writing down where your hours went last week.